Board Thread:Arrow discussions/@comment-9346948-20171102235741/@comment-24152851-20171103225157

Ninja72 wrote: Stryzzar wrote:

Ninja72 wrote:

Stryzzar wrote:

Ninja72 wrote:

Stryzzar wrote:

Xandermcc wrote:

Kir the Wizard wrote: That's exactly what happened on Gotham Wiki, which lists JIM GORDON and LESLIE THOMPKINS in the "Antagonists" category. Well that is one thing i hope the wiki fixes. Lol wut? How can the main protagonist be an antagonist? I know this is a completely separate case, but on The Flash its main protagonist literally  was the Season 3 main antagonist. Savitar is not Barry, he's a clone created through time travel that looks like Barry but they're two distintly different characters. Time remnant or not, he is still Barry. A time remnant is a past version of yourself, which becomes a time remnant  once you travel back in time, but only moments before you left, so it is still you. They used to be the same person, but their history diverged enough. They ended up with different personalities and abilities. In any case the category thing is not the same as this example. It'd be more like labelinng Barry Allen as an antagonist if he walks the dark side. I know that the category thing is not the same. Did you read my original comment "I know that this is a completely separate case, but on The Flash its main protagonist literally was the Season 3 main antagonist". The category thing is for when the main protagonist becomes evil, but on The Flash it was a future time remnant version of the protagonist, who had become evi, not the version of the protagonist we were currently seeing, so yes you are right it is not the same, but I never said it  was. If it was 2024 Barry who turned evil then I would agree, but time remnants are kind of a special case. They coukd be comsidered the same person, but at the same time they're not. Our Barry will never end up as Savitar.