User talk:Itamar20112/Archive 3

RE: Invasion! (The Flash)
Not only was the previous page almost empty, it had no sources whatsoever. I then happened to find a reliable source stating its title, so I recreated the page. —MakeShift (talk page) 14:00, November 16, 2016 (UTC)

RE: Oliver Queen's bow
It's funny, because you're the one who said you "fixed" the appearances for the Oliver Queen's bow page when you applied for content moderator. So stop lying. The reasons the other episodes don't have both bows was because you didn't add it when you "fixed" it as you would put it. I'm not the one adding rules, you are. Gamingbeaster (talk) 21:37, March 16, 2017 (UTC)
 * When did I change an existing rule? Are you delusional? YOU created a rule by "fixing" the Oliver Queen's bow page appearances by not adding another bow if two bows were used in one episode. You're not allowed to add new rules just because you "feel" like it. You're not an administrator and I know the administrators wouldn't appreciate you doing that. As for Kendra, I didn't change an existing rule. There are many pages that have "(indirectly mentioned)" next to it on an episode. I don't like arguing either, but you really don't know what you're talking about. Gamingbeaster (talk) 21:28, March 17, 2017 (UTC)
 * Again, you've added another rule by adding archive footage next to the episodes on actors and actresses pages. YOU'VE added two new rules so far when you're not even an administrator, which is laughable. For example, Manu Bennett was not in the Deathstroke suit in Invasion!. It was a stunt double. Even TimeShade had to undo that edit you made if you look at the revision history. Archive footage is not a new acting scene, it's old footage. Why would we add a new episode to the appearance section of an actor if they didn't play any new acting scenes? Also please don't make another heading on my talk page, it creates spam. Just stick to the first one. You're are the one trying to change rules and make up new rules, not me. Gamingbeaster (talk) 08:45, March 19, 2017 (UTC)
 * Well, TimeShade said this a while ago, http://arrow.wikia.com/wiki/John_Wesley_Shipp?diff=132744&oldid=132739. That just proves my point and that I'm right. Gamingbeaster (talk) 00:20, March 20, 2017 (UTC)
 * No, he undid it because that person ADDED a credit scene to the appearances when it was archive footage, so he removed it. Also Kir The Wizard isn't a administrator so he doesn't make the rules. He added that 4 months later after TimeShade's edit so he must've not seen it. TimeShade is usually the one who does things, rarely MakeShift so he probably doesn't know as well. Just stop arguing with me, you're not going to win. Gamingbeaster (talk) 01:37, March 21, 2017 (UTC)
 * First of all, it's spelled "administrator" not, "administor". TimeShade is way more active than MakeShift and is constantly updating this wiki. I actually didn't see the archive footage part because I don't look at every single damn word on an article. I just haven't noticed it in a while. I've removed them before but I started to again. I honestly don't care about the archive footage. Even though they shouldn't be on articles, be my guest and constantly add them because I'm not editing warring wtih you anymore. We were talking about Oliver Queen's bow but you changed the topic because you knew you were wrong about adding and changing appearance rules. "Archive footage" is old footage used in a previous episode. The actor/actress didn't act again in a new acting scene. They're mainly flashbacks/hallucinations that will be used in a new episode from an old episode. I rather just talk about this over chat because my talk page is getting way too big. You don't have to respond with a big paragraph like you constantly do. Just tell me a time when you can chat considering you live in a different time zone than me. Gamingbeaster (talk) 23:12, March 21, 2017 (UTC)

RE: Question
Damien refers to something along the lines of the "zombie" that Eobard's running from, doesn't he? Then yeah, definitely, he's just not mentioned by name. —MakeShift (talk page) 14:18, March 23, 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, of course, I'm still caught up in the last episode haha. As it's referring to a specific thing, I think this would constitute a mention. —MakeShift (talk page) 14:39, March 23, 2017 (UTC)

RE:Time remnant Doomworld
I was talking about the episode Doomworld. If Eobard was not a time remnant, then he would not need to lock Hunter in a cell, because Hunter would not be trying to kill him anymore. Ninja72 (talk) 13:56, May 11, 2017 (UTC)

Aberrations
A time remnant is a completely different concept than an aberration. By that logic, all time remnants are aberrations. Ninja72 (talk) 18:16, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

That must have been some sort of  metaphore.Ninja72 (talk) 18:20, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

I do not need a video, I already knew about this moment. Also, keep in mind that aberration is a real word, not just one invented for the show. It means something, which is not normal. Probably what they meant.Ninja72 (talk) 19:03, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

I feel like the legends does not  know about time remnants, which is why they labelled him as a aberration. Ninja72 (talk) 22:13, December 6, 2017 (UTC)

Kuasa
Kuasa merging with the Water Totem is apparently considered as a mutation, which I believe is why  people added her to the meta-human page and in the meta-human category. I am really not sure about this, so maybe we should ask an adminNinja72 (talk) 16:32, February 20, 2018 (UTC)

Kuasa was already removed from the meta-human list by another person. I havent watched the latest episode yet, but yeah, if the totem is inside her, then she is not a meta. But like IHHeroes pointed out, Nate is a meta, and he appeared. Ninja72 (talk) 11:51, March 27, 2018 (UTC)

No problem, there is no way you could have known after all, so it s ok.Ninja72 (talk) 12:04, March 27, 2018 (UTC)

RE: Think Fast
Because the trivia you've added is arbitrary and unnecessary, especially in a shared multiverse in which characters are independent of one another. —MakeShift (talk page) 05:22, May 17, 2018 (UTC)

RE:Alterego mention
Because as far as I know, we do not do that for mentions. Many characters are mentioned as their alterego and yet it always says just mentioned.Ninja72 (talk) 17:13, October 24, 2018 (UTC)

Probably TimeShade.Ninja72 (talk) 17:26, October 24, 2018 (UTC)

Earth 90 Flash
When I moved that page, I did it on my phone. No time to do the others and really no conjecture name can be given though they're hardly deserving a page as them being dead is no different than random background characters being shown dead. 09:24, December 4, 2018 (UTC)

RE: Grodd
Because there's not a need to denote that it's in the past, as it's the exact same as if they appeared in the modern day. He's the exact same character, so it's unnecessary. —MakeShift (talk page) 10:24, December 5, 2018 (UTC)

Legacy (Arrow)
Yes. I noticed this months ago when it was done. I have asked TimeShade multiple times to automate it as he has the access to the bot. I can also do it myself, but he has the access to the bot. I understand it is inconvenient but this is where we are at. $$\int$$ IHH dt      (UTC)
 * He is not retired; only partially active. He chose to ignore the request. Probably due to time constraints (which seeing as his life is very busy is the most likely cause). We have been in talks about giving me bot rights as well though. $$\int$$ IHH dt      (UTC)

Re:tem
Well, at least in my opinion, it is not better at all. Ninja72 (talk) 14:52, June 15, 2019 (UTC)

Also, up until now, I have literally never seen that template, so are you sure it is still used? On here for example, MakeShift could have changed it to use that template, but he did not.https://arrow.fandom.com/wiki/Nora?diff=417525&oldid=417524 Also, I fail to see how it looks cleaner, considering it adds way more code in source mode.Ninja72 (talk) 14:54, June 15, 2019 (UTC)

Well, I checked here and it says it is used on many pages, but in a transclusion.https://arrow.fandom.com/wiki/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Plainlinks?limit=500. Ninja72 (talk) 15:21, June 15, 2019 (UTC)

well, to be honest, I do not know what it means either :D I checked wikipedia to see what that means and could not really understand much of it. I thought you would.Ninja72 (talk) 15:30, June 15, 2019 (UTC)

Anyway, I have checked if the template will work, if we do not change the way the external pages are linked to and it does, it does not show the blue arrow in visual editor. I think this compromise will satisfy both of us.Ninja72 (talk) 15:47, June 15, 2019 (UTC)