Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-9346948-20170303073602/@comment-7890302-20170303194056

Kir the Wizard wrote: Nobody700 wrote:

Also hypocritical cause I read No Man's land, and that's how he solved 80% of his problems. Well, not really, as he kept fighting the villains just exchanged territories as he took them out (though the "Blue Boys" also did, I'll give you that), but I think Batman had a point: if not for Bruce Wayne and Lex Luthor pouring in money to rebuild the city (and lets let Lex's secret plot to take over real estate slide for now), it would have remained a warzone. Clark couldn't solve the problem even if he wanted too without becoming a millionaire.

Actually, scratch that. Superman couldn't. Clark could have helped Bruce as a voice in the media when he was trying to get the Congress to vote in Gotham's favor and whatnot.

I'm not saying Batman had a point, he was just a jerkass to Superman for no reason during the arc.