Board Thread:Arrow discussions/@comment-807326-20170202010018/@comment-3221148-20170205183331

Kaestal wrote: If you can figure out how to remove a helicopter from play with a bow and arrow with zero casualties then, by all means, go for it. What am I, Batman? That's exactly the sort of thing he or Green Arrow are supposed to be able to do.

Oliver also seems to be more willing to kill if needed nowadays, someone said it above, Oliver was trying to get Dinah to realize that revenge wasn't a good path to go down, he wasn't really saying "killing is wrong"

I mean, he's always been willing to kill, he just pushed the option way further down the list than "Plan 1 Step 2" Being willing to kill to get things done is one thing, lecturing someone on killing the psychopathic mastermind JUST after killing multiple people gruesomely is another one.

Batman lecturing Red Hood not to give into anger and kill a defenseless villain makes sense, because Batman does not kill random henchmen before his lectures.

Green Arrow lecturing Dinah right after killing folks himself looks hypocritical. What's so freaking different about killing somebody because of revenge or not? Because Sean lost his "weapon" during the fight? Would killing him while he was armed be better for Ollie's morality?

This is worse than the shit he gave about "not my opening move" to the Huntress.