Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-5441128-20170511124406/@comment-24152851-20170527023928

Dragonfly82 wrote: Stryzzar wrote: Dragonfly82 wrote: Stryzzar wrote: Dragonfly82 wrote: Stryzzar wrote: Dragonfly82 wrote: Stryzzar wrote: Well it got a 25% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, so I think the majority of the world agrees with me that it was terrible. Who freaking cares what they think? The movie gain $440.6 million from a bduget 155 million. How was that terrible? Yeah sure lots of people went to see it going in all excited, then came out thoroughly disappointed at having wasted their money.

A good film makes the majority of people like it, not a small handful. If it can't even achieve that, then it sucks. In Asia it made 900 million. That's not true. Not always. Some movie critics killed good movies because they didn't like it and that is why they killed it. It does not make difference what the majority of people likes. This wasn't just critics, it was based on reviews and votes by ordinary people.

If you like it then fine, but you're going to have to accept it's not a universally acclaimed film. If it was based on reviews and votes by ordinary people then many bad movie directors would be out of work. Yep, like the guy who made Dragon Ball Evolution who was forced to give an apology to the fandom nearly a decade later. You see how disrespectful they can be. He openly confessed he tried to make into a film to cash in on a very big franchise, but made no effort to research the material and ended up creating a trainwreck of a film.