Board Thread:Arrow discussions/@comment-9346948-20161208015315/@comment-27700324-20170117163417

TheDoctor230 wrote: Xandermcc wrote:

TheDoctor230 wrote:

Xandermcc wrote: TheDoctor230 wrote: Kaestal wrote: So because those few characters are dead and have stayed dead it is okay to resurrect yet another character.....

I don't think the point is getting across to you.

There shouldn't be any character that is revived on the show if they want to make fight scenes that go poorly and could possibly result in death matter, otherwise this will become DBZ where all deaths are just treated to the same sentence.

"Someone needs to go get the Dragonballs, we've got another one."

Sara Lance is the only one who has been resurrected, why not her sister. The only 2 deaths that shouldnt matter at all is the Green Arrow and The Black Canary, everyone else is expendable. Is the show called Arrow and Canary? No, no it isn't. Is the Black Canary an important part of the show? Yes it is.

U can think whatever u like but at the end of the day most people agree with me that laurel should return so ur argument is obsolete Black Canary is an important part of the Green Arrow mythology, but she is not as important as Speedy and Green Arrow himself. Like I said a tv show can kill anyone they want except the title character.

So apparently just because a lot of people want Laurel alive again, I should just give in to the geek equivalent of communism? "The Geek Equivalent of Communism" lol wtf does that even mean, it isn't about u having to give up its about saying that most people including myself want laurel back and u don't have the right to be an asshole about it It is the Geek equivalant of Communism because you think my opinion is obsolete and you basically prove my point with your reply by saying i'm an asshole for having an opinion.