Board Thread:The Flash discussions/@comment-4036559-20181010183851/@comment-37162533-20181014051225

SeanWheeler wrote: So, The Flash premiers a week earlier than the other Arrowverse shows. And Legends will be a week late? Imagine how hard it must be for someone to stream all four shows on Netflix in chronological order. Anyway, so Nora's here in the past. I wonder what would happen if her being here changed the timeline so that Barry and Iris had a son named Bart? It would be a crazy idea if Iris got pregnant and they were expecting baby Nora only to turn out to be a boy. And even worse, Nora is shocked too because she didn't have a brother so everyone gets worried about her becoming a paradox like Thawne. A game changer ( I thought that Wally was talking about the Time Bureau but in fact it was the Legends that he was talking about) that there are events in history that are fixed while there are other events in history that are soft/changeable. Go to 42 minutes and about 20 seconds or so. This game changer was possible in the DC comics because of the storyline ideas of Multiversity, Hypertime, and actual historian theories of what ifs. With the Legends new theory the effects of flashpoint may eventually get scrutinized, redefined and rexamined from the light of multiversity and hypertime if they get connected to the Arrowverse through DC's Legends of Tomorrow. Are you just not liking  the change and being rebellious against it for the Flash because my edit was edited out. If the Arrowverse doesn't get a more positive perspective on Time Travel than the evolutionary process can't evolve and grow the multiverse there for eventually the DC comics multiverse will ultimately become stagnant acquire a infinite crisis through that means.

Conlon94

For all preferences toward Evolution you are sure more like a Creationist Baraminologist or Creationist Fixity of Species believer when it pertains to comics and science fictionin than a Evolution believer since you are sure choosing the concepts of Creationists over those of Evolutionists. If you don't know what I am talking about do your internet research on the two or three viewpoints on the websites of Answers in Genesis and Institute of Creation Research.

Conlon94

I know that you probably don't care about what I think however in my opinion flashpoint and butterfly effect in itself is the worst kind of concepts on Time Travel from evolutionary perspective on a cosmic infinite multiverses scale ever it is actually like creationists arguingarguing/debating with evolutionists that mutations is actually more harmful than beneficial to the genetic code/genome but just discussing time travel and the space/time continuam rather than mutations and the genetic code/genome. And don't forget some of your dislike of crossovers and if you have to go with crossovers you would prefer subfranchise crossovers and Intercompany/cross franchise crossovers where are you even ditching the microevolution to macroevolution evolutionary concept. You should then see from the perspective that you see things the importance of DC comics, Marvel comics, Star Trek, Stargate, Doctor Who, Transformers, Stargate, Star Wars, Babylon 5, and so many other franchises how important it is to have time travel(cosmic mutations on the basic level), subfranchise and Intercompany/crossfranchise crossovers(microevolution to macroevolution type of cosmic mutions). Just having so many universes/multiverses/Earths that are considered seperate by most writers must be wreaking havoc on the Gnostic Dualism viewpoint that could be involved in these stories. Although from including both closed and open ecosystems with the interaction of individual universes and multiverses within entire megaverses and incarnations/regenerations of the Omniverse. You ask how can the cosmic laws of maths, science, and magic maintain organization then apply the principle of epigenetics(above genetics:switching on and off the individual genes and genetic laws within the genetic code/genome). But instead with a more a cosmic application there would be epilaws to turn on and off those of infinite subuniverses  within individual universes. Then there would be more epilaws to govern those epilaws in the interaction between the universal level and the multiversal level. Then more epilaws to govern those epilaws in the interaction between the multiversal level and the megaversal level. Then more epilaws to govern those epilaws in the interaction between the megaversal level and the Omniversal level. And I guess logically there would have to be even more epilaws in order to keep the epilaws of each and every regeneration/incarnation of the Omniverse in check. You should then see from the perspective that you see things the importance of DC comics, Marvel comics, Star Trek, Stargate, Doctor Who, Transformers, Stargate, Star Wars, Babylon 5, and so many other franchises how important it is to have time travel(cosmic mutations on the basic level), subfranchise and Intercompany/crossfranchise crossovers(microevolution to macroevolution type of cosmic mutions). Just having so many universes/multiverses/Earths that are considered seperate by most (I meant fans my Kindle's touchscreen key board screwed up my typing) must be wreaking havoc on the Gnostic Dualism viewpoint that could be involved in these stories. Although from including both closed and open ecosystems with the interaction of individual universes and multiverses within entire megaverses and incarnations/regenerations of the Omniverse. You ask how can the cosmic laws of maths, science, and magic maintain organization then apply the principle of epigenetics(above genetics:switching on and off the individual genes and genetic laws within the genetic code/genome). But instead with a more a cosmic application there would be epilaws to turn on and off those of infinite subuniverses  within individual universes. Then there would be more epilaws to govern those epilaws in the interaction between the universal level and the multiversal level. Then more epilaws to govern those epilaws in the interaction between the multiversal level and the megaversal level. Then more epilaws to govern those epilaws in the interaction between the megaversal level and the Omniversal level. And I guess logically there would have to be even more epilaws in order to keep the epilaws of each and every regeneration/incarnation of the Omniverse in check.

Conlon94

I guess my strong opinion on this subject is due to the thought that you can apply Carol Linneaus taxonomy to the organization of the Entertainment industry/Omniverse through the following: Kingdoms are the Entertainment industry Genres, Families are the Entertainment industry Franchises, multiverses are approximately somewhere between the Species and the Family levels, Species are the universes, and Subspecies should approximately be Subuniverses. And then don't forget that also even if you choose to not have Intercompany/crossfranchise crossovers as canon there is also the fact that writers seem to choose to use Thomas Huxley's idea of comparative autonomy at a cosmic level when sharing ideas between franchises. The question is will the actors, writers, producers, and company owners choose to answer these continuity questionsquestions for all the franchises at once in a gradual decades overall Omniversal Evolutionary story.

Conlon94

In order to go along a full/complete microevolution to macroevolution Evolutionary perspective writers, and producers have to attempt extremely controversial gamechangers to the traditional storyline right now season 11 of Doctor Who is going through such of a controversy involving the Doctor regenerating to a female rather than a another male this time.