Board Thread:Arrow discussions/@comment-807326-20170202010018/@comment-29493700-20170212045524

MakeShift wrote: JQuake101 wrote: Stryzzar wrote: For the love of crap. The treatment of Laurel is NOT misogynistic. It's unfair treatment to one character who happens to be female. It would be misogynistic if in the examples you listed, Sara was a male, but your point is invalid when it's a girl who's overshadowing the other girls.

The only remotely misogynistic thing that Arrow ever did was having Isabelle's "strong woman who wants to thrive in a man's world" plot being turned into a "revenge for the death of a loved one" cliche. The treatment of Laurel WAS misogynistic. I just listed several examples of misogyny in Arrow, and how Felicity Smoak as a whole is a character the writers use to actively spout out misogyny towards other women on the show. Please keep on topic with the thread and be reasonable. I attempted to quell the argument but you're clearly a blatant troll. If you really desperately want to argue more, start your own thread. Definition of a troll:

''make a deliberately offensive or provocative online post with the aim of upsetting someone or eliciting an angry response from them. ''

You can't call someone a troll because we're having an (admittedly intense) debate. Grow up, and stop being so soft.