Board Thread:Supergirl discussions/@comment-807326-20171205052556/@comment-27700324-20171211055238

SeanWheeler wrote:

Xandermcc wrote: Yeah, but despite them being on the show, they aren't dead. I know, I know. I'm not saying they are dead.

Anyway, while it is possible that main characters on Supergirl could die because cast members have died on other shows, I don't want it to be Samantha that dies. You know that Superman wouldn't kill? Supergirl shouldn't either because she's a female version of her cousin. If Supergirl kills Sam, and people see her as the female Superman, what message does that make? That girls are killers? We wouldn't want that stereotype, would we? Well one girl killing doesn't make that message be what they give out. However Supergirl is different to Superman. She kills. That is a fact. Just like how both in the comics and the show, Green Arrow kills. She doesn't abide to his moral code because unlike the Kents, the Danvers family are scientists, they take morals in based on the situation. Such as if more lives will die if they don't kill someone. So yeah, Sam is so going to die because Reign's rampage isn't stopping at what she has done so far. What happens when it goes beyond criminals? Supergirl isn't going to let that slide.