Board Thread:The Flash discussions/@comment-9346948-20160525000159/@comment-25322628-20160715005843

Kaestal wrote: Aggression25 wrote:

Kaestal wrote: Or he kills Laurel himself to preserve the timeline. Heroes don't kill good people, no matter what. Not unless they become corrupted beyond morality. If Laurel being alive directly resulted in thousands or millions more dying, what would you do? I myself wouldn't hesitate to put the needs of the many over the needs of the one.

Plus, it would need to go further, kill Laurel Lance so hard that resurrection is impossible even with Time Travel and put the issue to rest by then having E-2 Laurel kill a child and render her irredeemable as she has no guilt or remorse for that action.

I am kinda tired of seeing the "BRING LAUREL BACK AND MAKE DEATH POINTLESS" comments. I mean... why not the thousands of people who have died over the course of each show? But no, only the character that was considered useless and only want her to be revived so the "true love" between Laurel and Oliver can come to fruition, despite him cheating on her really hard.

Whats that? They were not only divorced in the comics but as of New 52 they haven't met, and the show doesn't have to follow the comics? Ridiculous. I would find a way to resolve the issue without resorting to murder. We time travel many times and always change the future by rewriting the past!