Board Thread:Council of Arrowverse Wiki/@comment-9346948-20180119051714/@comment-1783334-20180124012035

"Invincibility changes the rules here." No, it does not. Like I said, we can say on the magic page that it is one of the few substances that can a Kryptonian, but harming everyone does not make it a weakness because weaknesses must be unique to that category. What is unique about magic harming a Kryptonian if it harms someone else? It affects everyone the same way.

Just because a majority of wikias list it, doesn't mean we should. There are some DC wikias do paragraph format and don't even mention magic being a weakness. Your majority argument is thus, invalid. Besides, if you have done job or graduate school interviews, you would know you don't get in by doing what everyone else is doing. You get in by standing out. A good example would be last week's Flash episode. Barry was underqualified compared to other applicants and what got him hired was an answer to an interview that made him stand out. The same rule applies in real life. Also, your argument is a perfect example of what I mean by double standards. You're saying we should copy everyone else because it supports your argument, but the second standing out benefits you in any way such as in interviews, you will want to be unique and stand out. You want to add magic to Kryptonian weaknesses under the premise they face it more often than everyone else. That means we have to list bullets as a weakness for humans being it affects humans more often than it affects Kryptonians, but you don't want to do that because "it is obvious". Being obvious other matter because by your earlier arguments to me, they are threatened by bullets more often than speedsters and Kryptonians because they lack invincibility and/or the speed to catch the bullets.