Board Thread:Council of Arrowverse Wiki/@comment-9346948-20180119051714/@comment-1783334-20180122051040

Xandermcc wrote: Cloudtheavenger wrote: So where do we stand with the red sunlight argument? We haven't touched that one for a while. I say it should be removed and we add a sentence under Kryptonian Physiology saying prolong periods without yellow sunlight exposure or exposure to red sunlight will deplete them of their powers. Except that is essentially a weakness then. You act like red sunlight just gets rid of X-Ray Vision or just does something minor. It doesn't. Their powers are completely gone. Meaning they could get shot, or even killed. Some don't even have any combat skills and need their abilities in a basic brawl. I never said it does something minor. Shouldn't add words to people's mouth. I'm well aware it strips them of all their power. It restores them to their basic physiology on Krypton. Losing an enhancement is not a weakness. Also, your last argument just adds to my point. Not having an enhancement is not the same as a weakness. By your argument, Moira Queen and Robert Queen and others like them should have "No Combat Experience" as a weakness because they cannot properly defend themselves. Please do not tell me you plan to add that weakness to every character that cannot fight. Back to my point, lacking an enhancement, like martial arts, is not a weakness. Just like that, lacking the yellow sunlight enhancement is not a weakness because they're susceptible to things that would kill any other person, weaknesses not worth mentioning for reasons already covered. Kryptonite is a weakness because it weakens them in ways it doesn't weaken non-Kryptonians.