Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-5441128-20170511124406/@comment-5441128-20171004234830

Stryzzar wrote: Dragonfly82 wrote: Stryzzar wrote: Dragonfly82 wrote: Stryzzar wrote: Dragonfly82 wrote: Xandermcc wrote: Dragonfly82 wrote:

Xandermcc wrote:

Dragonfly82 wrote:

Xandermcc wrote:

Dragonfly82 wrote:

Xandermcc wrote:

Dragonfly82 wrote:

Xandermcc wrote:

Dragonfly82 wrote: Did he go to 88 miles in a hour and have the time circuits on? They said he just drove a regular car that speed. That is not enough. Yeah, he had no time cirtuits and he didn't have a Delorean. At least the mummy with the Addidas shoes made more sense. lol That's actually a news. Could by proof of time travel or a hoax. It is tricky when modern editing can be used. Like all those pictures of people who look like Harry Potter. They had a video which was show on YouTube a tomb was shown. Special effects and editing can still be used today. You have no grey area? What's more likely? Hoax, or some person invented time travel and dropped a shoe in a tomb? You can easy discredit many stuff. After all who would be open that stuff from Star Trek could exist. There are people which did think Internet was nothing but a simple thought. Right now time travel isn't just unlikely, it's impossible by conventional science as the speed of light cannot be reached (aside from FTL particles like tachyons).

It's all nice to want all this stuff to be real, but there's no feasible evidence for any of it. For your information I have massive scepticism let's say a attractive woman says she is from a future and we are a couple. My mind would think? What is she drinking? How stupid does she think I am? So I am Realistic Optimist. I want more butter on a sandwich before I believe in time travel. I am open to practical and fiction. But seeing and knowning has a difference. Then what point are you trying to get across? It sounded like you're supporting that adidas mummy thing as proof of time travel. No, but about 20 % and 80 % Scepticism.