Sara Lance has been resurrected the most in the Arrowverse. Alternate timelines do count. You can argue the semantics but the fact that she was resurrected the most remains obvious. Please stop undoing my edits because the trivia there is wrong.
1. Sara was killed by Thea and brought back via the Lazarus Pit.
2. Sara was killed by Damien Darhk.
3. Sara was killed as a result of Eobard Thawne.
4. Sara was killed by zombies.
5. Sara was killed by a unicorn.
Those timelines, whilst erased, are still valid because at the end of the day she was brought back from the dead either via time travel or other time-manipulative actions.
Alternate timelines is not resurrection. Being brought back from death and someone changing the timeline to prevent your death from happening are completely different things.
The two aren't mutually exclusive. Sara literally did die. The definition of a resurrection is to return from being dead. Even though the new timeline would prevent that death, it still happened in the previous timeline. In-universe, the death may have been erased, but out-of-universe we know that death still occurred in the entire timeline of events, leading to present day. Lala was one of the most resurrected characters in a single timeline, whereas Sara holds that title generally. Maybe you can edit the trivia to reflect that instead.
Yeah, thanks for asking. There is another case like this. Natalie (CC Jitters) needs to be moved to just Natalie. And her and Margot's infobox images also need moving. Sorry to bother you with so much stuff.
I say you're being willfully ignorant and stupid if you genuinely believe she should be labeled an unknown KF until it's flashily shoved in our face, and it'd be ridiculous to think it's some other version we still haven't met yet.
No I agree with you, I don't really care if she's considered to be E1 or E2 Killer Frost (though what you and Ninja72 are saying makes sense that she's E2), I'm just pointing this out as an inconsistency on the wiki. I agree that it's unnecessary and counterintuitive to have this "can't say it unless 100% confirmation" policy and I also think NYC Wells is obviously Sonny Wells but they won't let that be changed, so I guess I was just taking the devil's advocate position here because I'm frustrated that that isn't accepted as well. Another example is the 2024 Crisis, it's not confirmed it's where Barry and Eobard came from when they went to 2000, but it's implied and makes a lot of sense. So I feel like it's hypocritical to have that on the wiki when it's not technically confirmed but then to have NYC Wells and Sonny Wells as two separate pages. The separate Earth-Prime and Earth-1/38/TUD5 pages is also another case where it may be trying to be as factual as possible but really it makes it more inconvenient and confusing.
Are you talking about the erased future thing or her birthday? If it is the latter, the source is in the trivia section on The Death of Vibe. However, some people think that 28 actually means 2/8, which is how people write February 8 with only numbers in the US and that her birthday is on the 8th rather than the 28th. Idk about this honestly.
No, I mean the erased future thing. But her birthday is also a question, and like you're saying the proof around it is shaky at best. The other source of information was also a tweet that no longer exists. Personally I had not even understood how her birthday was gleaned from the code she put in in Death of Vibe. At least a note in the reference may be helpful I think.
I think it is just Gamemnae, because she and Leviathan were in both halves while Lex was only in the second. Plus, Lex was already main last season, it would make no sense for him to be main for two seasons in a row.
I saw on the Barry page you were saying the admins decided his page should be Earth-1 because he and Earth-90 Barry are both starts of their own show. I also disagree with this a lot so could you link me to the page/discussion where they decided this? Also could you link me to where you learned they only allow active versions of a character to be one of the character's images? (As such shouldn't Matt Letscher's Eobard not even be an image on the images for Eobard? I'm not saying this should be the case, just pointing out a potential inconsistency)