Arrowverse Wiki

Rename[]

Since this page focuses entirely on the Glaze resident known as JJ Stewart, it just seems weird to have the page named “Ionosphere.” That’s like having the article about J’onn J’onzz be titled “Mars.” –Frungi (talk) 04:06, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Someone clearly disagrees. Okay. Why? And why revert to calling her “one of the Glaze”? —Frungi (talk) 03:55, 18 March 2022 (UTC)
Gonna have to agree with Frungi on this one. They left this so vague in the show that we can't just come out and say the Ionosphere is its own living being. It's clearly a reference to the species that inhabited Halo in the comics, but here it's not given a name.-BlindmelonKen (talk) 21:34, 18 March 2022 (UTC)BlindmelonKen
I’m gonna have to look for those comics. But TC’s mention of “them” in the present tense (And they watch us.) definitely leads me to believe that JJ wasn’t the only one of the… energy beings in this Earth’s ionosphere. But yeah, the Glaze is only mentioned twice, and only as an alternate name for the atmospheric layer. —Frungi (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
Instead of waiting for the article to get moved, you can just rewrite this as a location page and move the info about JJ to a separate page called JJ Stewart.Ninja72 (talk) 17:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
I had considered doing that, but wasn’t sure if it would be okay. Now it’s done; thanks for the push. —Frungi (talk) 06:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
I’m pretty sure the rewrite could use an experienced editor though. Did my best, but I’ve no idea how many or which episodes it appeared in, and probably some Arrowverse Wiki formatting conventions I missed. Hope it’s not too bad! —Frungi (talk) 06:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
You are right, it could use an experienced editor. but I can't help with that since I do not watch this show, so someone else would have to do it.Ninja72 (talk) 11:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

@User:IHHeroes On what basis do you say JJ “is literally the ionosphere”? JJ explicitly says she was trapped in the ionosphere; at no point did she claim to be it in any sense. I also take exception to the edits discussed right here being termed vandalism; you could have participated in the discussion if you disagreed. —Frungi (talk) 13:32, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

On the off chance that IHH was just trolling us by making things up… well played.
I’m not sure an admin should be doing that, but I sincerely hope it’s the case, because the only other explanation is that they unilaterally enforce their own version of reality and jump to conclusions without paying any attention to things like discussion or evidence. Because no reasonable person could even glance at this discussion and think the article was subjected to “excessive vandalism,” or hear those few lines of dialogue and conclude something so far off base. —Frungi (talk) 03:32, 14 April 2022 (UTC)
I can message him about it later, if that helps. --BlindmelonKen (talk) 20:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)BlindmelonKen
It seems he responded last night at least to Ninja’s message on his wall, but thanks. Still peeved that he rolled back edits seemingly without reading the edit summaries or glancing at the talkpage. —Frungi (talk) 23:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)